Imagine if you learned to drive a car the same way as you learn to ride a motorcycle. No scared parent beside you, no instructor with a set of their own pedals.
Some states require you to ride with a supervisor, following in another vehicle, but this isn’t always practical or desirable for either the learner or the teacher.
Instead, riders often learn their craft at a racetrack, before being let out into the big bad world on their own with an L plate on the back of their new two-wheeler.
So imagine going to Eastern Creek for a couple of days and then heading out in a car on your own.
Sure, a closed-off track helps you learn to control a vehicle, but without other road users, intersections or traffic lights, it’s hardly preparation for the road.
Most motorcyclists will already have a car licence and should be used to dealing with road conditions, but to a lot of people it makes little sense to learn on a track.
Victoria is the first state to have addressed this with new rules for learner riders commencing in March. Under the new Graduated Licensing System (GLS) the learner’s course involves an on-road component, in which riders are supervised and shown potential hazards in-situ, rather than in a classroom.
It’s now harder to get your licence, but will it put people off buying a two-wheeler?
For more information please download and read the full pdf article below.
A must read for motorcyclists who worry about existing road infrastructure and have interest in countermeasures to reduce the severity of motorcycles crashes.
This report presents the technical findings of a two-year study which sought to identify effective infrastructure improvements to reduce motorcycle crash risk and crash severity, based on how riders perceive, respond and react to infrastructure they encounter.
The project commenced with a literature review of national and international guides, publications and research papers, which also enabled the identification of knowledge gaps and areas where further detail was required. A crash analysis was undertaken to demonstrate the relationship between motorcycle crashes, travel period, vehicle configuration (i.e. motorcycle only and multiple vehicle crashes involving a motorcycle), road geometry, road layout (e.g. intersection type) and crash types. For comparative purposes, vehicle crashes at the same location were also analysed.
For more information please download and read the full pdf report below.
A lack of evidence has hampered the NSW Government’s well-intended approach to improving quad bike safety standards across the state, says the peak body representing Australia’s ATV distributors.
While generally supportive of SafeWork NSW’s new Quad Bike Safety Improvement Program announced last week, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) has called into question the SafeWork
NSW’s decision to subsidise the fitting of Occupant Protection Devices (OPD) to quad bikes when there is reliable evidence showing these devices cause harm to riders.
The Chief Executive of the FCAI Tony Weber said he was also surprised that SafeWork NSW would announce a safety program before it had even seen the outcome of its own safety survey.
“At a time when quad bike owners are looking for advice they can trust and are given the opportunity to contribute to the safety discussion, Safework NSW is providing advice prior to undertaking its survey,” Mr Weber said.
“There’s confused announcements and messaging here which needs immediate clarity from the Minister.
“Firstly, SafeWork has ignored the published evidence that warns against OPD fitment, and secondly it’s spending taxpayers’ money on commissioning an online survey which clearly won’t have an iota of influence on its stated position.
“This begs the obvious question: if their position is already decided, what’s the point is asking people what they think?”
Mr Weber said that a very experienced US engineering firm, Dynamic Research Inc. (DRI), had completed scientific studies to show OPDs can cause as many new injuries as they may prevent, and have data to show
they do not meet the required standard of a ‘safety device’ as outlined in the International Standard ISO 13232-5.
The FCAI believes the focus should be on convincing quad bike riders to wear helmets as the most effective way of preventing injury on straddle-type vehicles, with scientific papers and DRI Simulation studies agreeing on a 60 - 64 per cent reduction in head injury for ATV riders involved in incidents.
“Helmets, rider training, not allowing children onto adult sized ATVs or passengers onto single seat ATVs, and following the manufacturer’s warning and recommendations are the best and most well-known safety practices that can assist riders,” Mr Weber said.
“SafeWork NSW already has this known safety material in its messaging and the FCAI would like to work with SafeWork to communicate these messages as part of the public awareness campaign.”
“There are some strong positives from the Minister’s rebate program, including the subsidy of helmets and training courses. But the endorsement of OPDs is not one of them.”
The FCAI has been working hard to promote safe ATV practices and recently released its ‘5 Star Safe ATV User Guide’ which outlines how riders can improve safety outcomes with a number of tips, including a vehicle selection guide.
The 5 Star Safe ATV User Guide, an ATV safety video and further safety information can be found on the FCAI’s www.atvsafety.com.au website.
For further information contact:
Or the FCAI on (02) 62473811